1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The man who says he's worked out how to PREDICT earthquakes...

Discussion in 'General Chit Chat' started by Bootsonground, Jul 26, 2015.

  1. Bootsonground
    Online

    Bootsonground Guest

    The West Valley fault is "ripe". Just dont cough or sneeze in its vicinity.

    How do you know its "ripe"?
  2. Bootsonground
    Online

    Bootsonground Guest


    Ahhh So now I understand!!...Its a legal thing!
    Very scary!
  3. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    Albert Einstein was a theorist, almost everything he worked on was very high level with few if any immediate practical benefits to the human species.

    His early work on Brownian motion and the Photoelectric Effect provided concrete explanations of things that had been observed and known about for a very long time.

    Special Relativity on the other hand was profound but at the time had almost no practical application, General Relativity even more so.

    His work was typical of the kind of work that people and politicians love to decry and love to shout down as a waste of money and time because it was fundamental science with almost no payoff that anyone could see.

    GPS, lasers, nuclear power and bombs all of those came from scientists whose understanding of the fundamentals had been expanded dramatically by the work of Einstein, but Einstein himself he had little 'direct' input into practical technology and as such had little effect on peoples everyday lives.

    Stephen Hawking, he is the modern Einstein celebrity scientist and his work as far as I am aware has zero practical application whatsoever.

    Do we need these guys, hell yes we need them, but they are not the ones that actually create the practical 'progress' that we see around us in our day to day world, the people who do that are largely far less famous but no less brilliant.
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Bootsonground
    Online

    Bootsonground Guest

    I didn't study science but admire those that do.
    From what I understand about Einstien,he changed the way many scientists think and calculate stuff today.
    I have no doubt that many of the important discoveries in the future will be based on his tireless and out of the box thinking in the past. His theories on Space,Gravity,energy and matter seem pretty damned profound to me.. What a genius!
    But then what do I know!!
  5. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

    He was a genius and his work has stood the test of time better than many other ideas, Special Relativity has direct application in modern day particle accelerators and x-ray sources that are used to probe the structure of materials.

    But there were many of similar stature at that time, Bohr, Dirac, Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Fermi, the list is long.

    Thing is we know that General Relativity, while it is almost perfect, we know it is incomplete, it cannot explain the world of the very very small and it has problems explaining the observed acceleration in the expansion of the Universe at the big end of the scale.

    However the results he derived from a purely speculative piece of thinking were and are unparalleled in the history of the human race, never before had anyone derived a mathematical description of an aspect of the universe purely from first principles with little or no experimental evidence.

    His prediction that light would be bent by gravity had no precedent it came purely from the maths of General Relativity, and it was confirmed experimentally only eight years after he made the prediction, no one else has ever equalled that.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. KeithAngel
    Offline

    KeithAngel 2063 Lifetime Member

    Only use HP or Lea and Perrins myself but tastes vary :)
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Imagine if they took that approach with the weathermen.
  8. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    You missed that, some posts back. It is complicated, yes. But would still take some time to go through it. The lines of evidence are lengthy and manyfold. It would take hours to go through it. Sometimes the simple line of explanation is not enough. And sometimes the in depth line of explanation is not enough, especially if the person one seeks to explain it to is unreceptive in the first place. It helps if the listener has an open mind instead of one that is made up in the first place.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2015
  9. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Tough. Thats life. :D
  10. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Yeah Michael (dried) Fish :eek:
  11. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    I noticed that too. A misunderstanding of what scientists, whoever they are, are capable of.

    I do like to think that one day it might be possible to pick up on an impending quake. It was geophysical science that confirmed the outline of the continental plates.

    Measuring the magnitude of a weight on the end of a wire rope is easily done by the change in tension in the line. The key to predicting earthquakes more accurately, might be to establish a way of measuring the compression already built up in the ground before the quake happens. Not sure if that is possible / practicable. We can use GPS to measure the growth of Everest (for example) year on year. Something that wasnt possible some years back. Who knows what we will be able to do in the future.

    If we can measure the rate of movement of the plates in the region, it should be possible to calculate the locked in potential, year on year. The biggest unknown is the friction factor across the faultline. That assumes that in the short term, all else is equal.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2015
  12. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Yes. He would have been hung for that! :D
  13. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Yea a complete plonka. Didn't do his career any harm though!
  14. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Lots of variables in that sentence. Determining the tension would be a tough one. When it releases, even tougher.
  15. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    I remember it well. But he was from the " dont worry about it folks, sleep easy " branch of the prediction community. It seems you cant win. If you say, be careful there is a storm brewing and it turns out to be a light wind, you are damned alongside those like Michael Fish. Best policy is to slightly over predict.
  16. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Compression / tension. Depends on the fault. I should have said compression.

    Once released at the quake, the compressional forces will have dissipated of course. Till the next time when the cycle would repeat itself over again. Which is what seems to have happened in the case of the West Valley fault. It is cyclical. Subduction, build up of compressive forces, quake, relaxing of compressive forces. Build up of compressive forces, quake, relaxing of compressive forces. Etc etc.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2015
  17. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

  18. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

  19. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    "In the years since the Loma Prieta quake, geophysicists have developed methods to describe deformation of the crust related to faults using three types of motion: interseismic, coseismic and post-seismic. Interseismic motion is the slow movement along faults that takes place over the long intervals between earthquakes. This motion is evidence of strain accumulating or deformation occurring in Earth’s crust and provides clues to where earthquakes might next occur. Coseismic motion is rapid displacement that occurs at the time of an earthquake. Post-seismic motion takes place in the days to months after a quake as the crust adjusts and returns to a relatively stable state. By using GPS equipment and software and two different methods, scientists can measure all three types of motion to a precision of a few millimeters."

    http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/precise-fault-how-gps-revolutionized-seismic-research


    Needs to be read and understood. Vast difference between this and the opening post.
  20. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Firstly, WSM (World Stress Map ) in conjunction with Big Data needs to be utilised by the Philippine authorities. If it isnt already.

    Secondly, it is possible to measure tectonic stresses across a region as well as vertical stresses with depth. This technique has been used in the oil industry for a number of years with a lot of success and for several applications. I might have suggested seismic data but we wouldnt want to trigger the quake. :D. A series of slim boreholes along the axial length of the fault line, parallel to the faultline, and further out would enable acoustic type logging devices to log the acoustic properties of the rocks around the borehole. A change in stress would show up as lateral variation in those properties. That way a clearer assesment could be made on how fully loaded a fault system might be and over time.

    http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/pub/introduction/introduction_frame.html

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2015

Share This Page