1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Philippines bans the taking of selfies

Discussion in 'News from The Philippines' started by Maharg, Sep 17, 2014.

  1. Howerd
    Offline

    Howerd Well-Known Member Trusted Member Lifetime Member

    It does seem a popular pastime to put photos on facebook. My fiancee has just posted a plethora of photos from a wedding she attended between an American and Filipina yesterday. I wonder if a 'church' will be regarded as a public place under this new law, if it comes into force?
  2. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    They reviewed the GoPro Hero2 camera on the gadget show some time back. Think it got good ratings as I recall.
  3. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Not just for that. We had a company come to our works to do a promo video for the products we make. Each and everyone of us had to sign a consent form agreeing that we didn't mind being included in the video (assuming they used that part of the video).
  4. Timmers
    Offline

    Timmers Well-Known Member Trusted Member

  5. Howerd
    Offline

    Howerd Well-Known Member Trusted Member Lifetime Member

    These 100 year friends knew what a selfie was before I did!

  6. oss
    Offline

    oss Somewhere Staff Member

  7. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    My boss has one. I had a touch of it the other day when he was flying it and videoing at the local go kart track. Impressive bit of kit.
  8. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

    Yes, we have a selfie extender rod or whatever you call it...forgotten the name of it.
  9. Anon220806
    Offline

    Anon220806 Well-Known Member

  10. bigmac
    Offline

    bigmac Well-Known Member Trusted Member

    i think this new law is spot on---too many selfies look bloody awful
  11. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

  12. Howerd
    Offline

    Howerd Well-Known Member Trusted Member Lifetime Member

  13. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    In fact here is a selfie done by the wife's friends boyfriend, filipino ingenuity :)




    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2014
  14. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    I think the camera has a fish-eye lens
  15. Markham
    Offline

    Markham Guest

    You had to sign what's known as a "Model Release" and that effectively grants your company the copyright to your image(s) portrayed in the video and it can use that/those image(s) without paying you a royalty. However the Blair government, I believe it was, introduced some proposed legislation that is very similar to this House Bill which would outlaw taking photos of certain public buildings, defence establishments and photos containing persons unrelated to the photographer. I am not sure what happened to that (Westminster) Bill.

    This Bill is specifically designed to protect richer Filipinos for it is for that reason the remedy is a civil rather than criminal action and is an exercise in subjugation. Civil cases are expensive to mount, beyond the means of your average phone-toting selfie-taking Filipino and since this is civil law, there's no prescribed penalty meaning the amount of money required to settle a case can be unlimited. An extorter's charter.

    If passed, this idiotic bill could result in there being no TV news programs and newspapers without photos which is precisely what the nation's corrupt want since there'll be absolutely no chance of accountability.
  16. Anon04576
    Offline

    Anon04576 Well-Known Member

    Ah model release is it. Yes the bill seems ludicrous and can't imagine that being passed.

Share This Page