1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

About those proposed new rules on immigration

Discussion in 'UK Visa and Immigration Help' started by Kuya, Apr 26, 2012.

  1. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    It has been over a month now since the leaked letter from Theresa May to Nick Clegg made a story in the Telegraph, and as such we have not had as much of a bread crumb if news about this since :erm:

    And so it has got me thinking about these proposals..

    And I am in serious doubt if we will see any of these take any shape at all! We already know they would be challenged in court pretty much straight away, there are numerous people who have made this public. Plus, I doubt they could stand up in court (setting very high minimum pay standards for sponsors of entry visas). Also, given the last few weeks worth of problems for this Government, not least the Theresa May, I cannot think why they would want to push ahead with something that will get challenged in court - potentially making the odd minister look foolish.

    However, I do think that the time limit before ILR can be applied for will be increased to 5 years! This would bring it in line with the EEA route and so would not get challenged in Europe (it might, but it would likely fail if a challenge went through). The Government could also use this to bring in another visa, an extension before ILR can be applied for, raising funds for the coffers and also keeping people on their toes for another few years. It might also weed out a few fake marriages, as it would be unlikely that people on those arrangements would keep in contact for so long. And if they got divorced, out goes the foreigner:rolleyes:

    I guess we will all be waiting on the Queens speech, this will outline any changes proposed to go through Parliament, if these changes are supposed to kick in around June. Also the report this is all based on is pretty shocking in how it fails to address the core issue - Do immigrants through the family visa system cost the taxpayer, and how much? Though I doubt they were given that task, it would require a huge amount of data and would take a year or more to compile.

    So, all in all I feel pretty confident that later this year I will be sponsoring Joy's spouse visa to join me here in the UK. I doubt I will need to head off to another country to try out the EEA route... Though we shall see:erm:
  2. Micawber
    Offline

    Micawber Renowned Lifetime Member

    I hope you're right.
    There have been a number of speeches made by both Green and May wher they made specific mention of the new family migration changes to come into force in June.
    There are a lot of folk who would struggle with an income threshhold.
    Making the ILR route much longer than the current 2 years on FLR would be a much easier change.

    Having said all that though Kuya, there's been a rather large batch of 'surveys' made public where over 80% of respondents have agree with a big tightening up on family migration. I get a feeling that the general public would not have any issues with any of the changes.

    As you say, we just have to wait and see.
  3. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    True. The general public would not have a problem with these proposals, plus it would be a big plus to the Tory core base. That said, I truly think they would be shot down in court and would be taken to court come July (should these proposals come in force in June) and would more than likely be found discriminatory. As Dom pointed out in another thread, UKBA officials already know this and see these proposals as human rights minefields waiting to happen.

    There is though another scenerio.. I could see those proposals getting pushed through and after they get chucked out by a court the Government would shrug their shoulders and say "Look, those Eurocrats destroying our democratic rights - again!!" But given the recent bungling, I doubt they would try this..

    Though, I am hopeful. I am not counting my chickens just yet.
  4. KeithAngel
    Offline

    KeithAngel 2063 Lifetime Member

    the right to family life is a central plank of the European Community at the moment it seems that it is the counterbalance to racist/zenaphobe saber rattling long may it be so.

    I personaly think the 5 year rule (for permanent residece)is a positive step along with residency being conditional on the continuation of the marriage and makes it more dificult for scammers its also Canadas system where the sponser is responcible untill the sponcee gains naturalisation
  5. Micawber
    Offline

    Micawber Renowned Lifetime Member

    It's true that 'right to a family life' is key in EU human rights.
    But the establishment of a family life within EU is the key. That why plenty of people suddenly develop (create) close links of EU family life.

    I don't believe that rights to family life are applicable when there is no EU based family.

    Then again we'd have to wait and see what loopholes these weasel lawyers come up with. Rest assured if they did find any, they would follow the money and legal aid for most undesireables seems to be a pot of gold.

    Whoops! nearly fell into rant mode then. :oops:
  6. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    I would think that previous court cases have established the right to a family life can and does include none EEA family members:erm:
  7. Micawber
    Offline

    Micawber Renowned Lifetime Member

    Sorry Kuya, I did not say that non-EU family members were excluded from the "right to a family life" at all. Please read my post again.
    I suggested that the family life that is protected under EU law must already exist within the EU zone. Means that it may only include a family already together and living within the EU.

    I am not a lawyer and was only trying to forward the debate to establish some clarity between us all.
    I also am keen to learn more.

    I haven't researched previous court cases, but the ones that have hit the media have all involved families who are already living in EU.
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2012
  8. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    No need to say sorry Peter:D

    I think the problem with the EEA rules are that there are so many judgements made based upon rights provided by the EU, yet so many are still vague or contain areas for debate and potential legal challenges.

    Perhaps my opinion is based a lot more on hope than sound knowledge, in fact I have already made some minor notes in case I am going to court at some point, but I just doubt I will need to (or have the patience to - I would go via the EEA route if the £25,700.00 minimum comes into effect)..
  9. aposhark
    Offline

    aposhark Well-Known Member Lifetime Member

    Just hope for all of you folk who hope to bring your wives over here that they lower the high yearly salary minimum.
  10. Micawber
    Offline

    Micawber Renowned Lifetime Member

    I totally agree.
    I know that the £26k is supposed to be about average, but it also means that around half the fulltime working population earns below that.

    Not so many in the public sector can reach that.

    This gov't has voiced it's desire to introduce regional salaries for the public sector based on regional cost of living etc.
    We all know about London weighting incomes and housing costs in London, but now there is talk of have special london benefits.

    Yet, the proposed income threshold is across the board.

    I only hope there will be some workarounds based on actual affordability and not just gross income.

    It's a very very unfair proposal. IMO
  11. RB2004
    Offline

    RB2004 Member

    Hi they do not come into force at the beggining of june :(

    I know it is still 16 days away, but i still need to get my CNI which takes 22 days apparently.. so i wouldnt be able to lodge an application before the end of the month. was hoping to get the application in before the new rules came into effect.
  12. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    There has been no confirmation of the new rules, and it seems that the home office is dragging their heels on this one as there has been a number of people (including myself) who have made it clear that we will fight these changes in the courts should they see the light of day.

    I think that these proposals might be on ice whilst Theresa May tries to limit the powers of article 8, supposedly to limit criminals claiming a right to a family life, but it could also include elements to that bill that would have negative implications to the rest of us law abiding folk..
  13. RB2004
    Offline

    RB2004 Member

    has anybody heard anything new? since june is now fast approaching.
  14. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    Before these rule changes get announced, the government is firstly trying to limit the rights for those of us who would take them to court, by limiting the courts jurisdiction on these matters. Despite the Daily Mail and people of a low IQ thinking that the changes to the courts jurisdiction is meant to ease the deportation of terrorists and criminals, it will also mean that you or I could be very limited trying to take the government to court if we feel our rights are being eroded.

    Right now I would guess the government has no intention to pass these rule changes until the Crime and Courts Bill has passed and is in force. Make no mistake, this bill will stamp on your rights as well as mine!
  15. RB2004
    Offline

    RB2004 Member

    Hi,

    So we arent likely to see changes in June?

    I know this government has targets to meet, but surely these restrictions are getting too much now and bordering breach of human rights.. argueably they are already!

    I can kind of understand why they want to impose these income restrictions.. as its an easy way to dramatically cut the amount of successfull visa applications, and their excuse, to stop people coming here and claiming benefit money from the government.

    but realistically its nothing more than a "cheat" or a "quick fix" as income should not have any bearing on it really.. if you was to marry an english woman, there would not be income based restrictions preventing you from doing so and living together as a couple.. if you cannot afford to support her and your family then its "your problem" but because as british citizens we fall in love with a foreign national, the government says that because we arent earning enough money in some cases that we arent entitled to a happy family life which is nothing short of discrimination.

    Thing is, if they fixed these immigration loopholes in other areas, they wouldnt need to be penalising born nationals.

    Ive been really worrying about these changes, as Im worried like other people if the application is not in and changes are imposed we will essentially be locked out... so ive been trying to rush and get the application submitted before the end of the month.
  16. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    Your guess is as good as mine!

    I am watching this on a daily basis and cringe in sheer horror at the embarrassment that is the Liberal Democrats, forgetting all of their so called principals trying to justify a ministerial position in this coalition. Labour will oppose this and so they should! The Liberal Democrats of old would have said they would oppose this but it is funny what they say and what they do are completely different things.

    That Crime and Courts bill is currently going through the House of Lords before it hits the commons, we can only hope it gets changed somewhere in that process..
  17. KeithAngel
    Offline

    KeithAngel 2063 Lifetime Member

    Ive been looking through the UK border agency and somethings seem to have changed

    http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/eucitizens/documents-family/#

    "Can British citizens' family members enter and reside in the UK under European law? Close

    If you are a British citizen, you cannot ordinarily rely on the provisions of European law to bring your non-European family members to the UK. Instead, you should seek permission under the British Immigration Rules for those family members to enter and remain in the UK. See the Partners and families section for more information

    However, the European Court of Justice held in Case C-370/90 that British citizens can rely on European law in circumstances where they are returning to the UK in order to work or settle here in a self-sufficient capacity after working in another European Union state. In these circumstances, the returning British citizen has the right to be accompanied by his or her husband, wife or civil partner, if they have previously been living together in the other European Union state."

    notice the condition of working so this means that although the missus and nippa have 5 year residence cards the right to freedom of movement has been given a condition any research comments welcome
  18. Aromulus
    Offline

    Aromulus The Don Staff Member

    That has always been the essence of the "Sunder Singh Route to family reunification"..... As far as I know....
  19. KeithAngel
    Offline

    KeithAngel 2063 Lifetime Member

    just depends what they accept as self employed i guess the other question though is the right of free movement to work as I could employ the missus this year
  20. Kuya
    Offline

    Kuya The Geeky One Staff Member

    Yep, Surinder Singh.. Thanks to him in the worst case scenario. I could live in another EU country with Joy for 6 months and return to the UK with a five year pass for Joy..

Share This Page