And another fairly credible suggestion that the plane has been successfully landed in Iran, and is currently being converted into a chemical, biological or nuclear weapon. This could be used as a suicide bomb in the Middle East. Infowars.com...
That's why I was suggesting the aircraft could fly as far as Iran, I am not one for conspiracy theories, but vehicle theft had occurred to me. There are problems with that idea though, a 777 is big and it would not be that easy to fly it any distance with it not transmitting any valid identification. However if Iran had successfully acquired enough fissionable material to make a bomb the chances are that the bomb would be too large for any delivery system they have so stealing a plane that could carry that kind of load makes sense in that respect, target would have to be Israel as it's close enough that the flight could be short. On the cargo theory there are other more valuable dense heavy metals other than gold.
I didnt realise that the black box only kicks in in the event of accident / crash / submergence in sea.
I thought the black box starts recording as soon as the plane leaves the ground. I agree with you Maharg, why would Iran risk such a thing, anyway their new leader there is less of a threat nowadays that's why you don't hear as much news coming from that neck of the woods.
So where might be the passengers? It's not a credible theory at all, but it's possible the plane may have made it to Iran given the 777's range, but who is holding the passengers for the last 7 days? Don't tell me, they dropped them off at a small remote island in the middle of nowhere, just waiting for international rescue aka Thunderbirds to rescue them, with Obama at the controls. Normally any terrorist group holding a plane load of passengers will be parading them on TV by now.
Yes of course they do and it is probably a ridiculous theory, but stranger things and all that, we all know from experience that an aircraft is a very potent weapon.
When under water radio signals are more or less useless, radio waves do not propagate in water, it's going to be some kind of acoustic pinger and maybe that is only activated in the event of it being submerged, just checked and apparently that is the case.
Our favourite newspaper the Daily Mail is now saying the pilot was a political fanatic and pointing the finger at him.
Really? In this day and age of mobile phone and internet, it's going to be hard work hiding 230+ people for a week or more, someone is bound to say something, so no, I don't buy it.
If their objective was as in Dave's post 41 above, then they might not give a monkeys about the passengers....if you see what I mean.
The last time I read the Daily Sport I read about a surgeon who sewed someone's feet on the wrong way, so topless aliens, why not LOL
I hadn't actually read Dave's link until now, but Fact #4 is unlikely, if the phones stayed online then the cellphone companies know within fairly narrow limits where the phones are and were, in other words if the phones were on then the flight was trackable, also if they were on for days then they had to be running on GSM not 3G and that implies they had to be in range of a fairly good signal or even on GSM the batteries would have run out really fast.
The Daily Mail's idea of a political fanatic is someone who attended the sentencing of Anwar Ibrahim - in other words.. shock, horror, drumroll, crashing minor chords... .... ......a well educated middle class liberal.
SEPANG, Malaysia — " A signaling system was disabled on the missing Malaysia Airlines jet before a pilot spoke to air traffic control without mentioning trouble, a senior Malaysian official said on Sunday, reinforcing theories that one of the pilots may have been involved in diverting the plane and adding urgency to the investigation of their pasts and possible motivations. " http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/17/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-flight.html?_r=0