"Tommy Robinson"

No it's accept cookies or subscribe, they'll shove adverts at you either way.

The Guardian at least still gives you the free browsing option almost no one else does all paywalls now.

We can't expect newspapers or their people to work for nothing, 50 years ago all papers cost money and supported lots of jobs in printing, publishing and photography, I toured the Daily Record in Glasgow when I was 14 very busy place.

They competed via their headlines displayed on the paper at the newsstand.

The Internet changed the publishing medium, destroyed all those printing jobs and basically left a bit of journalism and photography and online publishing.

So if you or me are now getting our news from YouTube or Facebook or other online forums we're being forced to view advertising, they do everything they can to shove it in our faces, the Guardian at least still makes our choice pretty fair and they don't ask for much as a voluntary contribution most of the time.

Google now charge 15 quid a month to stop really **** dangerous advertising on YouTube and they don't even do investigative journalism.

Re the Guardian you can press backspace from the begging pages and read the article.

The rest of the news outlets that charge online charge a hell of a lot more than papers did in the 70s, 80s and 90s.

Yes the echo is pretty bad for that, and at it's worst on a phone.

I subscribe to the New Scientist, first read it in 1972 I bought a copy in Glasgow Airport as a kid it was a great news source but I don't trust it anymore since the Daily Mail bought them, they still claim editorial independence but I can feel the difference in it's coverage since the Mail bought them from Reed Business Publishing.

I'm not renewing it next year as a) it's expensive even for the app only version and b) my concerns about the reporting.